Yes, we have a lot to be thankful to Meryl for....
http://www.heraldsun.com.au/ipad/whooping-cough-baby-dies-in-royal-childens-hospital/story-fn6bfkm6-1226007211379
http://www.theage.com.au/victoria/death-sparks-vaccine-appeal-20110216-1awnl.html
"you can't die from whooping cough" - going to call these parents Meryl? Are all these diseases still on the decline?
Other great contributions to the world from Meryl:
- Defending shaken baby syndrome as scurvy
- Doubting HIV causes AIDS
- Claiming SIDS is due to lazy doctors
etc etc etc
Yep - lots of good stuff from a particularly callous lady.
As for the data I was somehow meant to get you... Read my post again where I quite clearly indicate why your graphs are nothing more than a comment on mortality, and show nothing about vaccinations. No one has kept it from you, as it's all in the public domain. Just like the graphs I presented from the GRIM books as well, no one is hiding them. I also didn't realise that I was duty bound to present them myself. Instead, I presented far more relevant and specific data. This isn't my job by the way, so I don't feel obliged to present you anything at all.
What you do with the graphs is pedestrian, and shows great leaps of logic that just don't stand up to scrutiny. Sure, it'll look good on "A Current Affair" or some other programme like that, but it just ain't right - the graphs are factual, but your conclusions aren't.
I realise you're too biased to see it otherwise, and you have a book to sell now, so you'll have to think you're right. But you just aren't. In the face of so much evidence to the contrary you stick to your guns (which is admirable) and maintain your brilliance. But you're still just wrong. Cherry-picking, biased data will keep your dreams alive. Shall we turn into another Nigeria, where hundreds of people died in the early 2000's when they withdrew vaccinations? http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18690921
Where's your theory about "they're all reducing naturally anyway" now?
You're not only stupid, your dangerous, and ethically reprehensible. Go on Meryl, publish that.
No comments:
Post a Comment